Surveillance Culture
After
9/11, Americans did not see the peaceful side of Islam anymore. The Bush
Administration had taken many steps to protect Americans from terrorism. This
had an effect on not only Americans but also Arabs as well- they were all
stereotyped as one negative group.
The DHS’s Transportation Security Administration agreement with the ATA
allowed Americans to stereotype people and quickly make an assumption about
them. This person’s life can be changed so quickly, just from the judgment of
someone else, even if they are simply driving their truck and glance over. America
was in a paranoid state, which catered to extreme assumptions and assumptions
made out of fear. We only have the pictures and videos that someone reported
which can interpreted in many different ways. What really qualifies as being
“out of the ordinary?” How do people really know what this person is going to
do in the future? This allows people to assume and imagine the worst, which can
take things way out of proportion. “‘In the rational west’, writes Edkins
(2003: 13), ‘we tend to seek certainty and security above all. We don’t like
not knowing. So we pretend that we do’.” The story that we do “know” is often
times irrational and jumps to the conclusion that there may be danger on the
near future. Imagine being in a predominantly Arab country and people taking
pictures and reporting you- just because you are driving with someone or buying
a specific thing at a store. This reminds me of events we see today. We have
the problem of stereotyping black Americans as criminals simply when they are
just living their own lives. There have been countless videos of white people
reporting black people to the police just for sitting in the car, or walking
down the street- not doing anything wrong. “For Michael Shapiro (1997: xi) it
is ‘architectures of enmity’, projected via images and stereotypes, that make
threat and antagonism possible. ‘People go to war’, writes James Der Derian
(2002: 5), ‘because of how they see, perceive, picture, imagine
and speak of others’. “ I liked this quote because I think it
portrays the Iraqi War. There was no reason to go to war with the Iraqis, and
the weapons of mass destruction were used to justify it. America went to war
with Iraq because they grouped all Arabs with terrorism. The stereotype that
all Muslims/Arabs are terrorists was very prevalent in society at that time
which helped fuel the war.
You are confusing the words "Arabs" and "Muslim", the country who holds the biggest Muslim community in the world is Indonesia, with more than 1/4 of the Islamic population, for that reason, most "Muslims" would look like this:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.seattleglobalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Ramadan-Seattle-3.jpg
And a big amount of Arabians are blond with blue/green eyes. One of the most beloved Turkish actresses, Meryem Uzerli, is blond with blue eyes, and all the Arabians I met during my Fulbright orientation had light skin, light hair and light eyes.
The concept does not go for all Muslims and all Arabs, but for those who fit the description of "Muslim" and "Arab" from a perspective of American and European Orientalism, being considered only those who look Muslim or Arabian from our perspective. That's why in most current films, Hispanic women play the roles of Muslim women, because they fit that ideal of "Middle Eastern" that Western societies have. That is also why it is mentioned in Leti Volpp's article (p. 155) that the Sikh men were also considered as potential terrorists.